Guaranteed

95.5% Pass Rate

CPA
Intermediate Leval
Management accounting September 2021
Suggested Solutions

Management accounting
Revision Kit

QUESTION 1(a)

Q Identify and explain four types of costs that are irrelevant for decision making.
A

Solution


Types of Costs Irrelevant for Decision Making


In decision-making processes, certain costs are considered irrelevant as they do not impact the choices or outcomes. Identifying and understanding these irrelevant costs is crucial for making informed decisions. Here are types of costs that are irrelevant for decision making:

  1. Sunk Costs:

    Sunk costs are costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Since these costs are in the past and cannot be changed, they are irrelevant for future decisions. Decision makers should focus on future costs and benefits.

  2. Book Value of Assets:

    The book value of assets (original cost minus accumulated depreciation) is irrelevant for decision making. The relevant factor is the current market value or the salvage value of the asset.

  3. Unavoidable Overhead Costs:

    Overhead costs that cannot be avoided in the short term are considered irrelevant for decision making. These costs are incurred regardless of the decision and should not impact the decision-making process.

  4. Future Unavoidable Costs:

    Costs that will be incurred regardless of the decision are irrelevant. Decision makers should focus on incremental or differential costs—costs that differ between alternatives.

  5. Notional (Imputed) Costs:

    Notional or imputed costs, which are accounting allocations rather than actual cash outflows, are typically irrelevant. These costs do not represent real cash expenditures and should not drive decision making.

  6. Interest on Sunk Investments:

    Interest on sunk investments, such as the interest on funds invested in a project that cannot be recovered, is considered irrelevant. This cost is a consequence of past decisions and does not impact future choices.

  7. Non-Cash Expenses:

    Non-cash expenses, such as depreciation, are irrelevant for short-term decision making. Cash flows and actual cash expenses are more pertinent considerations.

  8. Goodwill:

    Goodwill, representing the premium paid for an acquired business, is often considered irrelevant for certain decisions. It is an intangible asset that may not directly affect future cash flows.


By recognizing and disregarding these irrelevant costs, decision makers can focus on factors that truly impact the future outcomes of their choices.





QUESTION 1(b)

Q Required:

(i) Using linear regression, establish the production function in the form of Y = a+ bx.

(ii) From the equation in (b) (i) above, estimate the production cost that would be incurred on 50 units.

(ii) State any two advantages of regression method of cost estimation.
A

Solution


(i). Establish the production function in the form of Y = a+ bx.

X

Y
"000"


XY
"000"
30
22
33
39
41
24
29
32
38
15
45
35
460
300
480
550
570
310
410
455
530
250
700
490
900
484
1,089
1,521
1,681
576
841
1,024
1,444
225
2,025
1,225
13,800
6,600
15,840
21,450
23,370
7,440
11,890
14,560
20,140
3,750
31,500
17,150
∑X = 383 ∑Y = 5,505 ∑X² = 13,035 ∑XY187,490

b
=
n∑XY - ∑X∑Y

n∑X² - (∑X)²

b
=
12 x 187,490,000 - 383 x 5,505,000

12 x 13,035 - 383²

b = 141,465,000 / 9,731 = 14,537.56

a = (∑Y - b∑X) / n

a = (5,505,000 - 14,537.56 x 383) / 12
a = -5,240.46

Y = -5,240.46 + 14,537.56X

(ii). Estimate the production cost that would be incurred on 50 units.

Y = -5,240.46 + 14,537.56X

Y = -5,240.46 + 14,537.56 x 50

Y = Sh.721,637.54

(iii). State advantages of regression method of cost estimation.

  1. Quantitative Analysis:

    Regression analysis provides a quantitative and mathematical approach to understanding the relationship between variables. It allows for a systematic analysis of the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable.

  2. Identification of Relationships:

    The method helps identify and quantify relationships between cost drivers (independent variables) and the cost being estimated (dependent variable). This is valuable for understanding the factors influencing costs.

  3. Prediction Accuracy:

    Regression analysis allows for the development of predictive models. By analyzing historical data and patterns, the method can be used to make accurate predictions about future costs, aiding in budgeting and planning.

  4. Multiple Variables Consideration:

    The regression method accommodates the consideration of multiple independent variables. This is useful when there are several factors that may influence the dependent variable, allowing for a more comprehensive analysis.

  5. Statistical Significance:

    Regression analysis provides statistical tests that indicate the significance of the relationships between variables. This helps in assessing the reliability of the model and the degree of confidence in the estimated costs.

  6. Flexibility:

    The method is flexible and can be applied to various types of cost estimation problems. It is not limited to specific industries or sectors, making it widely applicable in different business contexts.

  7. Continuous Improvement:

    Regression models can be updated and refined as new data becomes available. This allows for continuous improvement and adjustment of cost estimates based on the most current information.

  8. Cost Benefit Analysis:

    The method facilitates a cost-benefit analysis by assessing the impact of various factors on costs. This information is valuable for decision-makers in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different strategies or scenarios.





QUESTION 2(a)

Q Examine four limitations of financial accounting that have made organisations introduce management accounting
A

Solution


Limitations of Financial Accounting and Introduction of Management Accounting


Financial accounting, while essential for external reporting and compliance, has certain limitations that may not fully meet the internal management needs of organizations. As a result, many organizations have introduced management accounting to address these limitations. Here are some key limitations of financial accounting:

  1. Focus on Historical Data:

    Financial accounting primarily deals with historical financial data, providing a snapshot of past performance. It may not provide real-time information or insights into future trends, limiting its usefulness for managerial decision-making.

  2. Lack of Detailed Information:

    Financial statements, while providing an overview of an organization's financial health, may lack detailed information required for internal decision-making. Managers often need more granular data to make informed strategic and operational decisions.

  3. Emphasis on Monetary Transactions:

    Financial accounting focuses on monetary transactions and may not capture non-monetary factors that are crucial for management decisions, such as employee performance, customer satisfaction, or operational efficiency.

  4. Rigid Reporting Standards:

    Financial accounting follows strict reporting standards and frameworks, which may limit flexibility in adapting to the specific needs of internal management reporting. Management accounting allows for more customized and flexible reporting.

  5. External Stakeholder Orientation:

    Financial accounting is designed to meet the needs of external stakeholders, such as investors, regulators, and creditors. Internal management may require different types of information that are not emphasized in traditional financial statements.

  6. Non-Financial Performance Measures:

    Management decisions often involve considerations beyond financial metrics. Financial accounting may not adequately capture non-financial performance measures, such as key performance indicators (KPIs) related to operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, or employee productivity.

  7. Future-Oriented Decision Making:

    Financial accounting is backward-looking and may not provide the forward-looking information required for strategic decision-making. Management accounting incorporates budgeting, forecasting, and scenario analysis to support future-oriented decision-making.

  8. Costing Methods:

    Financial accounting may use traditional costing methods that allocate overhead costs based on simple formulas, which may not accurately reflect the actual costs associated with specific products or services. Management accounting allows for more sophisticated costing methods tailored to the organization's needs.


To overcome these limitations, organizations have introduced management accounting, which focuses on providing timely, relevant, and detailed information to support internal decision-making processes.





QUESTION 2(b)

Q Required:

(i) Based on a labour hour overhead absorption rate (OAR), compute the batch cost and unit cost using traditional absorption costing system.

(ii) The batch cost and unit cost using Activity Based Costing (ABC) system.
A

Solution


(i). The batch cost and unit cost using traditional absorption costing system.

A = 1,150 x 250
B = 190 x 60
C = 860 x 200
D = 300 x 120
Total
=
=
=
=

287,500 hrs
11,400 hrs
172,000 hrs
36,000hrs
506,900 hrs

O.A.R = 50,000 / 506,900 = 0.10 Per direct labour cost


Direct Material
Direct labour
Prime cost
Production O/h @ 0.1
Total cost
Output units
Cost per batch
A
412,500
2,300,000
2,712,500
271,250
2,983,750
250
11,935
B
45,000
91,200
136,200
13,620
149,820
60
2,497
C
420,000
1,376,000
1,796,000
179,600
1,975,600
200
9,878
D
108,000
288,000
396,000
39,600
435,600
120
3,630

Machine related cost = 14,600 / 1,710 = Sh.8.54

Machine dispatch and handling = 6,800 / 495 = Sh.13.74

Stores = 8,250 / 130 = Sh.63.46

Inspection = 5,850 / 47 = Sh.124.47

Set-ups = 6,200 / 43 = Sh.144.19

Engineering = 8,300 / 190 = Sh.43.68

(ii) The batch cost and unit cost using Activity Based Costing (ABC) system.



Prime cost
Machine related cost@8.54
Material handling and dispatch@13.74
Stores@63.46
Set ups@144.19
Inspection@124.47
Engineering support@43.68
Output
Total cost
Cost per unit
A
Shs

2,712,500.00
4,440.80
2,473.20
2,538.40
1,730.28
2,240.46
2,839.20
250
2,728,762.34
10,915.05
B
Shs

136,200.00
2,177.70
961.80
1,332.66
1009.33
995.76
1,659.84
60
144,337.09
2,405.62
C
Shs

1,796,000.00
5,209.40
2,816.70
2,728.78
2,307.04
1,618.11
2,271.36
200
1,812,951.39
9,064.76
D
Shs

396,000.00
2,775.50
553.60
1,650.22
1,153.52
995.76
1,528.80
120
404,657.40
3,372.15
Total
Shs

5,040,700.00
14,603.40
6,805.30
8,250.06
6,200
5,850.09
8,299.20

5,090,708.05






QUESTION 3(a)

Q Required:

(i) Average length of stay at Kusini Hospital.

(ii) Bed occupation percentage in Mashariki Hospital

(iii) Cost per in-patient day for both hospitals.

(iv) Cost per out-patient attendance for both hospitals.
A

Solution


(i) Average length of stay

500 beds x 365 days = 182,500

85% Occupancy = 182,500 x 0.85

155,125 inpatient days

Average stay = 155,125 / 8,165 = 19 days

(ii) Bed occupation percentage

( Actual inpatient days / Potential inpatient days ) x 100

( 23,472 x 7.50 ) / ( 780 x 365 ) x 100 = 62%

(iii) Cost per in-patient day for both hospitals.

16,285,590 / ( 23,472 x 7.5 ) = Sh.92.51

12,166,840 / ( 8,165 x 19 ) = Sh.78.43

(iv). Cost per out-patient attendance for both hospitals.

Cost of out-patient / No. of out-patient attendance

8,288,050 / 216,500 = 38.28

4,487,720 / 63,920 = Sh.70.21




QUESTION 3(b)

Q Required:

(i) Economic order quantity (EOQ) of raw material "Y"

(ii) Advise the management of the company on whether to accept or decline the offer.
A

Solution


(i) Economic order quantity (EOQ) of raw material "Y"

√( 2AO / HO ) = √( 2 x 48,000 x 120 / 8 )

1,200

(ii) Advise the management of the company on whether to accept or decline the offer.

Total cost = ((48,000 x 120) / 1,200) + ( 80 x 48,000 ) + (( 1,200 x 8) / 2)

4,800 + 3,840,000 + 4,800 = 3,849,600

Purchase price after Discount = 99 / 100 x 80 = 79.20

Holding cost = 10 / 100 x 79.2 = 7.92

Total cost(offer) = (( 48,000 x 120 ) / 2,000 ) + ( 79.20 x 48,000 ) + (( 2,000 x 7.92 ) / 2)

2,880 + 3,801,600 + 7,920 = Sh.3,812,400

∴ The management of Fanaka Enterprises should accept the offer because it reduces cost.




QUESTION 4(a)

Q Evaluate three benefits that would accrue to an organisation that has a cost accounting department
A

Solution


Benefits of Having a Cost Accounting Department


An organization with a dedicated cost accounting department can enjoy various benefits that contribute to effective cost management, decision-making, and overall financial performance. Here are some key benefits:

  1. Cost Control:

    A cost accounting department helps in monitoring and controlling costs within the organization. By analyzing cost variances and trends, it enables management to identify areas of cost overruns and implement corrective actions.

  2. Product Costing:

    Cost accountants can accurately determine the cost of producing goods and services. This information is crucial for setting product prices, assessing profitability, and making informed decisions about product lines.

  3. Budgeting and Planning:

    The cost accounting department plays a key role in the budgeting and planning process. It assists in developing realistic budgets, setting financial targets, and aligning organizational activities with strategic goals.

  4. Decision Support:

    Cost accountants provide valuable information for decision-making. Whether it's evaluating the profitability of new projects, assessing the financial impact of different scenarios, or making make-or-buy decisions, the cost accounting department offers insights to support informed choices.

  5. Performance Measurement:

    Cost accounting helps in measuring the performance of departments, products, and processes. Key performance indicators (KPIs) related to costs, efficiency, and productivity are monitored to assess performance and drive continuous improvement.

  6. Resource Allocation:

    Effective cost accounting facilitates optimal resource allocation. By understanding the costs associated with various activities, departments, or projects, management can allocate resources efficiently and prioritize investments that provide the highest return.

  7. Profitability Analysis:

    Cost accounting enables organizations to analyze the profitability of different products, customer segments, or market channels. This information is essential for strategic planning and resource allocation to maximize overall profitability.

  8. Compliance and Reporting:

    The cost accounting department ensures compliance with accounting standards and regulatory requirements. It prepares accurate and timely financial reports that provide a transparent view of the organization's financial performance.


Summary

Cost accounting department enhances an organization's ability to manage costs effectively, make informed decisions, and achieve financial success.





QUESTION 4(b)

Q Required
Prepare the following budgets:

(i) Production budget in units.

(ii) Materials usage budget in kilograms and litres.

(iii) Materials purchases budget in kilograms, litres and shillings

(iv) Labour budget in hours and shillings.
A

Solution


(i) Production budget in units.

Product
Sales (units)
Add: closing stock
Less: Closing stock
Units produced
M
2,000
200
(100)
2,100
K
1,500
150
(200)
1,450

(ii) Materials usage budget in kilograms and litres.

Material Product Total

Exe (Kgs)
Zed (litres)
M
4,200
2,100
K
4,350
5,800

8,550(kgs)
7,900(litres)

(iii) Materials purchases budget in kilograms, litres and shillings


Current usage
Add: closing inventory
Less: opening inventory
Materials to be purchased
Cost per unit (Sh)
Material purchase budget
Exe(Kgs)
8,550
855
(300)
9,105
100
Sh.910,500
Zed(litres)
7,900
790
(1,000)
7,690
70
Sh.538,300

(iv) Labour budget in hours and shillings.

Product Total


Skilled
Semi-skilled

M
(Ksh)

1,008,000
336,000

K
(Ksh)

348,000
580,000



1,356,000
916,000
2,272,000





QUESTION 5(a)

Q Required

(i) Process 1 account.

(ii) Process 2 account.

(iii) Process 3 account.

(iv) Abnormal loss account.

(v) Abnormal gain account.
A

Solution


(i) Process 1 account.

Units Cost per unit Amount Units Cost per unit Amount
Direct material
Direct material(additional)
Direct labour
Direct expenses
Production overheads
6,000




40




240,000
30,000
40,000
6,000
20,000
Normal A/C
Abnormal loss
To process 2


600
100
5,300


20
60
60


12,000
6,000
318,000


6,000 336,000 6,000 336,000

(ii) Process 2 account.

Units Cost per unit Amount Units Cost per unit Amount
Process 1
Direct material
Direct labour
Direct expenses
Production overheads
5,300




60




318,000
40,000
50,000
1,600
25,000
Normal loss
Abnormal loss
To phase 3


265
35
5,000


44
84
84


11,660
2,940
420,000


5,300 434,600 5,300 434,600

(iii) Process 3 account.

Units Cost per unit Amount Units Cost per unit Amount
Process 2
Direct material
Direct labour
Direct expenses
Production overheads
Abnormal gain
5,100





84





420,000
17,500
20,000
9,300
10,000
9,800
Normal loss
Clossing stock




400
4,700




65
98




26,000
460,000




5,100 486,600 5,100 486,600

(iv) Abnormal loss account.

Units Cost per unit Amount Units Cost per unit Amount
Process 2
Process 2

100
35

60
84

6,000
2,940

Process 1
Process 2
P & L
100
35

20
44

2,000
1,540
5,400
135 8,940 135 8,940

(v) Abnormal gain account.

Units Cost per unit Amount Units Cost per unit Amount
Process 3
P&L
100

65

6,500
3,300
Process 3

100

98

9,800

100 9,800 100 9,800





QUESTION 5(b)

Q Required:

(i) Margin of safety percentage.

(ii) The marketing manager has indicated that an increase in the selling price to Sh.12.25 per unit would not affect the number of units sold provided that the sales commission is increased to 8% of the selling price.
Required:

Determine the new break-even point in units.
A

Solution


(i) Margin of safety percentage.


Selling price per unit
Less:Variable production overhead
Less:Sales commission per unit
Contribution
Sh
11.60
( 3.40 )
( 0.58 )
7.62

Break even point = Total fixed cost / Contribution per unit

628,650 / 7.62 = 82,500 units

Margin of safety = ( 90,000 - 82,500 ) / 90,000 x 100

8.33%

(ii). The new break-even point in units.


Selling price per unit
Less:Variable production overhead
Less:Sales commission per unit
Contribution
Sh
12.25
( 3.40 )
( 0.98 )
7.87

Break even point = Total fixed cost / Contribution per unit

628,650 / 7.87 = 79,879 units




Comments on CPA past papers with answers:

New Unlock your potential with focused revision and soar towards success
Pass Kasneb Certification Exams Easily

Comments on:

CPA past papers with answers