CPA
Foundation Leval
Quantitative Analysis November 2015
Suggested solutions
Revision Kit
➧ | Quantitative Analysis -September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-May-2016-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-December-2017-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-May-2017-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-November-2018-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-May-2018-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-May-2019-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-November-2019-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-November-2020-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-December-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-April-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Quantitative Analysis-August-2021-Past-paper |
QUESTION 1(a)
Product | |||
Material (Kilogrammes) Labour (Hours) |
A 5 3 |
B 7 4 |
Available resources 13,400 7,800 |
Product | |||
Labour/Hour (Sh.) Material/Kilogramme (Sh.) |
A 140 236 |
B 265 710 |
Error ±10% ±5% |
Labour hours | Materials | |
Product A | 1,000 x 3 = 3,000 | 1,000 x 5 = 5,000 |
Product B | 1,200 x 4 = 4,800 | 1,200 x 7 = 8,400 |
Total | 7,800 | 13,400 |
QUESTION 1(b)
QUESTION 2(a)
By following these steps, you can use differential calculus to find the optimal solutions for various problems, such as maximizing profit or minimizing cost in business applications.
QUESTION 2(b)
QUESTION 2(c)
Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 |
Quarter 1 20 21 23 27 |
Quarter 2 32 42 39 39 |
Quarter 3 62 75 77 92 |
Quarter 4 29 31 48 53 |
X | Y | XY | X2 | T = a + bx | Y/T |
1 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 30.575 | 0.654 |
2 | 32 | 64 | 4 | 32.415 | 0.987 |
3 | 62 | 186 | 9 | 34.255 | 1.810 |
4 | 29 | 116 | 16 | 36.095 | 0.803 |
5 | 21 | 105 | 25 | 37.935 | 0.554 |
6 | 42 | 252 | 36 | 39.775 | 1.056 |
7 | 75 | 525 | 49 | 41.615 | 1.802 |
8 | 31 | 248 | 64 | 43.455 | 0.713 |
9 | 23 | 207 | 81 | 45.295 | 0.508 |
10 | 39 | 390 | 100 | 47.135 | 0.827 |
11 | 77 | 847 | 121 | 48.975 | 1.572 |
12 | 48 | 576 | 144 | 50.815 | 0.945 |
13 | 27 | 351 | 169 | 52.655 | 0.513 |
14 | 39 | 546 | 196 | 54.495 | 0.716 |
15 | 92 | 1380 | 225 | 56.335 | 1.633 |
16 | 53 | 848 | 256 | 58.175 | 0.911 |
∑X =136 | ∑Y=710 | ∑XY=6,661 | ∑X2=1,496 |
Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
2011 | 0.654 | 0.987 | 1.810 | 0.803 |
2012 | 0.554 | 1.056 | 1.802 | 0.713 |
2013 | 0.508 | 0.827 | 1.572 | 0.945 |
2014 | 0.513 | 0.716 | 1.633 | 0.911 |
Total | 2.229 | 3.586 | 6.817 | 3.372 |
Average | 0.557 | 0.897 | 1.704 | 0.843 |
QUESTION 3(a)
PERT identifies the critical path in a project, which is the sequence of activities that determines the project's minimum duration. This information is crucial for project managers to focus on tasks that directly impact project timelines.
By understanding the time requirements for each activity, PERT aids in efficient resource allocation. Project managers can allocate resources optimally, avoiding bottlenecks and ensuring a smooth workflow.
PERT incorporates uncertainty by considering a range of time estimates. This allows project managers to identify high-risk activities and plan contingency measures accordingly, reducing the impact of unforeseen events on project timelines.
PERT provides a visual representation of project activities and their dependencies through network diagrams. This helps in effective communication and coordination among team members, stakeholders, and other project participants.
During project execution, PERT allows for real-time monitoring of activities. Any deviations from the planned schedule can be identified, and corrective actions can be taken promptly to keep the project on track.
PERT facilitates the optimization of project schedules by identifying non-critical activities with float or slack. Project managers can make informed decisions on how to allocate time and resources to non-critical activities without affecting the overall project timeline.
QUESTION 3(b)
Number of units packaged Time (seconds) |
14 230 |
8 110 |
9 130 |
12 190 |
6 109 |
11 181 |
10 154 |
5 79 |
10 144 |
X | Y | X2 | XY | Y2 |
14 | 230 | 196 | 3,220 | 52,900 |
8 | 110 | 64 | 880 | 12,100 |
9 | 130 | 81 | 1,170 | 16,900 |
12 | 190 | 144 | 2,280 | 36,100 |
6 | 109 | 36 | 654 | 11,881 |
11 | 181 | 121 | 1,991 | 32,761 |
10 | 154 | 100 | 1,540 | 23,716 |
5 | 79 | 25 | 395 | 6,241 |
10 | 144 | 100 | 1440 | 20,736 |
∑x=85 | ∑Y=1,327 | ∑x2=867 | ∑xy=13,570 | ∑Y2=213,335 |
X | Y | Ye | (y - Ye)2 |
14 | 230 | 221.01 | 80.82 |
8 | 110 | 124.11 | 199.37 |
9 | 130 | 140.26 | 105.27 |
12 | 190 | 188.71 | 1.66 |
6 | 109 | 91.81 | 295.50 |
11 | 181 | 172.56 | 71.23 |
10 | 154 | 156.41 | 5.81 |
5 | 79 | 75.66 | 11.16 |
10 | 144 | 156.41 | 154.01 |
∑x = 85 | ∑y = 1,327 | ∑(y - ye)2 = 924.55 |
QUESTION 4(a)
A saddle point is a concept in game theory associated with a payoff matrix. In a two-player zero-sum game, a saddle point occurs when the maximum value in a row is the minimum value in its corresponding column. At this point, neither player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy because doing so would result in a worse outcome for them. The saddle point represents a stable solution where the players have reached an equilibrium. In such cases, the game is said to have a solution in pure strategies, and the saddle point is a key element in determining optimal strategies for the players.
QUESTION 4(b)
Businesses use linear programming to optimize inventory levels. It aids in deciding the optimal quantity to order and when to reorder, considering factors like carrying costs, demand variability, and order processing costs.
In finance, linear programming is applied to optimize investment portfolios. It helps in allocating assets to maximize returns while adhering to constraints such as risk tolerance, budgetary limitations, and investment guidelines.
Linear programming assists businesses in allocating marketing resources effectively. It helps in determining the optimal distribution of advertising budgets across various channels to maximize reach and impact.
Linear programming is used in optimizing transportation and logistics networks. It helps in determining the most cost-effective way to transport goods from multiple sources to multiple destinations, considering factors like transportation costs and capacity constraints.
Businesses utilize linear programming for optimizing employee schedules. It assists in determining the most efficient assignment of staff to shifts while considering factors like labor costs, employee preferences, and legal constraints.
Linear programming is applied to optimize supply chain operations. It helps in coordinating and optimizing various activities within the supply chain, including production, distribution, and inventory management.
QUESTION 4(c)
Model I II |
Additional cost per day (Sh.) 370 390 |
Increase in typist's efficiency (%) 50 75 |
QUESTION 4(d)
Number of house sold Number of months |
0 1 |
1 2 |
2 1 |
3 2 |
4 1 |
5 3 |
6 2 |
House sold
Salary plan
|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
A | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 |
B | 20,000 | 32,000 | 44,000 | 56,000 | 68,000 | 80,000 | 92,000 |
C | 0 | 20,000 | 40,000 | 60,000 | 80,000 | 100,000 | 120,000 |
Salary plan | Minimum pay off |
A | 50,000 |
B | 20,000 |
C | 0 |
House sold
Salary plan
|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Maximum |
A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,000 | 30,000 | 50,000 | 70,000 | 70,000 |
B | 30,000 | 18,000 | 6,000 | 40,000 | 12,000 | 20,000 | 28,000 | 30,000 |
C | 50,000 | 30,000 | 10,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50,000 |
QUESTION 5(a)
Example: In a financial simulation, the endogenous variable could be the total revenue ( R ) generated based on pricing decisions and market demand.
Parameters are input variables with constant values for a given simulation. They are fixed values that do not change during the simulation run.
Example: In a manufacturing simulation, a parameter could be the cost per unit ( C ) of raw materials, which remains constant throughout the simulation.
Input variables drive the simulation. They can be either controlled (under management control) or uncontrolled (not under management control).
Example: In a project management simulation, a controlled input variable could be the project team size ( T ), while an uncontrolled variable could be external market conditions affecting project timelines.
Status variables reflect the general state of the system at various times during the simulation, capturing overall system behavior.
Example: In a healthcare simulation, a status variable might be the average patient wait time ( W ), indicating the system's efficiency in managing patient flow.
QUESTION 5(b)
Digital boxes sold (units) Probability |
0 0.05 |
1 0.05 |
2 0.10 |
3 0.15 |
4 0.20 |
5 0.15 |
6 0.15 |
7 0.10 |
8 0.05 |
QUESTION 5(c)
Value Sh."000" 0 < 100 100 < 200 200 < 300 300 < 400 400 < 500 500 < 600 600 < 700 700 < 800 800 < 900 |
Number of outstanding sales invoices 20 18 22 15 9 8 4 2 2 100 |
Midpoint x | f | fx | x² | fx² |
50 | 20 | 1,000 | 2,500 | 50,000 |
150 | 18 | 2,700 | 22,500 | 405,000 |
250 | 22 | 5,500 | 62,500 | 1,375,000 |
350 | 15 | 5250 | 122,500 | 1,837,500 |
450 | 9 | 4,050 | 202,500 | 1,822,500 |
550 | 8 | 4,400 | 302,500 | 2,420,000 |
650 | 4 | 2,600 | 422,500 | 1,690,000 |
750 | 2 | 1,500 | 562,500 | 1,125,000 |
850 | 2 | 1,700 | 722,500 | 1,445,000 |
∑x = 4,050 | ∑f = 100 | ∑fx = 28,700 | ∑x² = 2,422,500 | ∑fx² = 12,170,000 |
➦ | Economics-September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➦ | Economics-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➦ | Economics-May-2016-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➦ | Economics-November-2017-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-May-2017-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-November-2018-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-May-2018-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-May-2019-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-November-2019-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-November-2020-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-December-2021-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-April-2021-Past-paper |
➦ | Economics-August-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-May-2016-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-May-2017-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-November-2017-Past-Paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-November-2018-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-May-2018-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-May-2019-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-November-2019-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-November-2020-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-December-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-April-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Introduction to Law and Governance-August-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting -September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting -November-2015-Past-Paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting -May-2016-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-November-2017-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-May-2017-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-November-2018-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-May-2018-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-May-2019-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-November-2019-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-November-2020-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-December-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-April-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Financial Accounting-August-2021-Past-paper |
CPA past papers with answers