CPA
Advanced Leval
Advanced Financial Management May 2016
Suggested solutions
Revision Kit
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-May-2016-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-November-2017-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-May-2017-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-November-2018-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-May-2018-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-May-2019-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-November-2019-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-November-2020-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-December-2021-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-April-2021-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial Management-August-2021-Past-paper |
QUESTION 1(a)
➫ Defining a utility function for a group of individuals with diverse risk attitudes poses a challenge due to the inherent difficulty in capturing varied preferences within a cohesive numerical framework.
➫ In practical terms, utility is not easily quantifiable in numerical terms, deviating from the assumptions made by utility theory.
➫ Specifying utility functions becomes particularly challenging due to conflicts of interest between shareholders and managers, who often harbor distinct risk attitudes.
➫ The dynamic nature of investor preferences introduces complexity, as utility is subject to constant fluctuations over time.
➫ The intricacies of diverse risk attitudes among individuals within a group further complicate the accurate specification of utility functions.
➫ Utility, being inherently challenging to measure numerically, raises questions about the applicability of traditional utility theory in real-world scenarios.
➫ The conflict of interest between shareholders and managers, stemming from disparate risk attitudes, adds an additional layer of complexity to utility function specification.
➫ The assumption of numerical measurability of utility may oversimplify the multifaceted nature of individual preferences and satisfaction.
➫ In the context of utility theory, the challenge of specifying utility functions is compounded by the need to reconcile conflicting risk attitudes among stakeholders.
QUESTION 1(b)(i)
QUESTION 2(a)(i)
QUESTION 2(a)(ii)
QUESTION 2b(i)
Project | Weight | Beta | Weight beta |
1 | 0.28 | 0.63 | 0.1764 |
2 | 0.17 | 1.15 | 0.1955 |
3 | 0.31 | 0.90 | 0.2790 |
4 | 0.26 | 0.86 | 0.2064 |
Beta of investment fund | 0.8573 |
QUESTION 2(b)(ii)
Project | Weight | Beta | Alpha | Comment |
1 | 10 | 5 + 0.63 x 9 = 10.67 | -0.67 | Overvalued |
2 | 18 | 5 + 1.15 x 9 = 15.35 | 2.65 | Undervalued |
3 | 15 | 5 + 0.90 x 9 = 13.10 | 1.90 | Undervalued |
4 | 13 | 5 + 0.86 x 9 = 12.74 | 0.26 | Undervalued |
QUESTION 3(a)
QUESTION 3(b)
Range "Millions" |
Cost of equity % | Cost of preference shares % |
Cost debt % | Weighted Cost % |
0 - 16 | 0.45 x 21.58 = 9.71 | 0.30 x 10 = 3 | 0.25 x 6.63 = 1.66 | 14.37 |
16 - 20 | 0.45 x 21.58 = 9.71 | 0.30 x 10 = 3 | 0.25 x 9.33 = 2.33 | 15.04 |
Over 20 | 0.45 x 24.79 = 11.16 | 0.30 x 10 = 3 | 0.25 x 9.33 = 2.33 | 16.49 |
QUESTION 3(c)(i)
QUESTION 3(c)(ii)
Project | Initial outlay million |
A | 8 |
C | 9 |
D | 6 |
23million |
QUESTION 4(a)
EV = Market Capitalization (all share classes) + Net Debt (and other liabilities, e.g., pension deficits) + Minority Interest − Associates (both fair value).
➫ Total Enterprise Value: Reflecting the comprehensive value of all business activities.
➫ Operating Enterprise Value: Derived by subtracting the value of non-operating assets at market value from the total enterprise value.
➫ Core Enterprise Value: Computed by subtracting non-core assets from the total enterprise value, rendering core EV a more nuanced and subjective measure.
The multifaceted nature of enterprise value enhances its utility in evaluating a company's true financial standing and facilitates a more nuanced analysis beyond the limitations of market capitalization. This comprehensive approach, encompassing debt and adjustments for various interests, allows for a more accurate assessment of a company's valuation and financial health.
QUESTION 4(b)(i)
QUESTION 4(b)(ii)
QUESTION 4(b)(iii)
Year 1 Sh."000" |
Year 2 Sh."000" |
Year 3 Sh."000" |
Year 4 to ∞ Sh."000" |
|
Sales | 200,000 | 280,000 | 320,000 | |
Expenses | (120,000) | (160,000) | (180,000) | |
Capital allowance | (20,000) | (30,000) | (40,000) | |
Interest | (10,000) | (10,000) | (10,000) | |
PBT | 50,000 | 80,000 | 90,000 | |
Less Tax(30%) | (15,000) | (24,000) | (27,000) | |
PAT | 35,000 | 56,000 | 63,000 | |
Less:Retention | (25,000) | (30,000) | (35,000) | |
Cash flows | 10,000 | 26,000 | 28,000 |
QUESTION 5(a)
A forward contract is an agreement to buy or sell a specific amount of currency at a future date at a predetermined exchange rate.
Helps companies lock in a future exchange rate, providing certainty about the cost or revenue in their base currency.
Similar to forward contracts, futures contracts involve an agreement to buy or sell a specific currency at a predetermined price on a specified future date.
Traded on organized exchanges, futures contracts offer standardized terms and can be used for speculation or hedging.
Currency options provide the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a specific amount of currency at a predetermined price within a specified time frame.
Offers flexibility; companies can choose whether to exercise the option based on market conditions.
Involves borrowing or lending in a foreign currency in the money markets to offset the impact of exchange rate movements.
Helps eliminate forex risk by creating an offsetting position in the money market.
Adjusting the company's operating practices or structure to offset the impact of currency fluctuations.
Companies might match currency revenues with currency expenses or establish production facilities in the same currency zone as their major customers.
Consolidating payables and receivables in each currency to reduce exposure.
By offsetting payable and receivable amounts in the same currency, companies can reduce the need for external hedging instruments.
Timing the payment or receipt of foreign currency invoices to capitalize on expected currency movements.
If a currency is expected to strengthen, a company might delay payments in that currency; if it's expected to weaken, the company might accelerate payments.
Involves swapping cash flows in different currencies to manage exchange rate risk.
Companies can use swaps to convert debt payments or interest payments from one currency to another, aligning cash flows with their risk tolerance.
Entering into agreements with suppliers or customers to share or absorb the impact of currency fluctuations.
Agreements can include pricing adjustments, cost-sharing mechanisms, or currency clauses to distribute risk.
Operating in multiple currencies or markets to spread and reduce risk.
By diversifying operations, a company can minimize the impact of adverse currency movements in one region.
QUESTION 5(b)(i)
QUESTION 5(d)
➢ | Advanced Public finance-September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-May-2016-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-November-2017-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-May-2017-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-November-2018-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-May-2018-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-May-2019-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-November-2019-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-November-2020-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-December-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-April-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Public finance-August-2021-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-May-2016-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-December-2017-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-May-2017-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-November-2018-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-May-2018-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-May-2019-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-November-2019-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-November-2020-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-December-2021-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-April-2021-Past-paper |
➦ | Advanced Financial reporting & analysis-August-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Auditing & assurance-September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-May-2016-Past-paper |
➢ | Auditing & assurance-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-November-2017-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-May-2017-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-November-2018-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-May-2018-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-May-2019-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-November-2019-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-November-2020-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-December-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-May-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-September-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-April-2022-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-August-2022-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-December-2022-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Auditing & Assurance-April-2023-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➧ | Advanced Management accounting-May-2016-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-November-2017-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management accounting-May-2017-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-November-2018-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management accounting-May-2018-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management accounting-May-2019-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-November-2019-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-November-2020-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-December-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-April-2021-Past-paper |
➧ | Advanced Management Accounting-August-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-September-2015-Pilot-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-November-2015-Past-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-May-2016-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-November-2016-Past-Paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-November-2017-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-May-2017-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-November-2018-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-May-2018-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-May-2019-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-November-2019-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-November-2020-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-December-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-April-2021-Past-paper |
➢ | Advanced Taxation-August-2021-Past-paper |
CPA past papers with answers